In the Sonam Raghuvanshi case, the accused has changed his story, increasing troubles for the SIT, and made a shocking revelation in court.

.

.

Shocking Turn in Sonam Raghuvanshi Case: Lokendra Tomar Denies All Charges, Challenges SIT Investigation

Indore, India – The high-profile Sonam Raghuvanshi case has taken a dramatic and unexpected turn after Lokendra Tomar, a real estate broker arrested in connection with the case, denied all allegations against him in court. This sudden reversal has intensified challenges for the Special Investigation Team (SIT), which had considered Tomar a key link in the destruction of evidence related to the suspicious death of Sonam Raghuvanshi and her alleged involvement with Raja Kushwaha.

Lokendra Tomar was arrested on Monday by Indore police from Gandhinagar, Gwalior. After undergoing a medical check-up, he was presented in court and placed under transit remand, allowing his transfer to Indore for further interrogation. Authorities believe Tomar played a central role in helping conceal evidence connected to Sonam’s death, but his recent statement has raised serious questions and potentially shifted the direction of the investigation.

According to SIT sources, Sonam had been living in a flat in Indore that was owned or managed by Lokendra Tomar. In the initial stages of the investigation, WhatsApp chats recovered from Tomar’s phone showed that he allegedly pressured another individual, Shilam James, a local property broker, to destroy evidence. These communications explicitly pointed to a coordinated effort to eliminate any traces linking Sonam or Raja to the flat.

Following these conversations, Shilam reportedly destroyed multiple pieces of evidence. Some of them were burned, including a black bag that investigators believe contained critical items. Other objects were thrown into a nearby drain. Police later recovered several items from the drain, such as Sonam’s laptop, Raja Kushwaha’s mobile phone, and additional personal belongings.

For days, the SIT believed they were making significant progress in building a strong case based on this recovered evidence and digital correspondence. However, Lokendra Tomar’s sudden denial has forced investigators to reconsider some of their assumptions.

In his court appearance and during brief interactions with the media, Lokendra Tomar stated, “I don’t even know who Sonam Raghuvanshi is. I did not rent my Indore flat to her. I gave the flat to someone else, and I have never seen Sonam in my life. All the allegations against me are false.” He further added, “I have not helped either Sonam or Raja in any way. I had no idea that Sonam ever stayed at my flat. I came to know about this only through media reports.”

Tomar also announced that he would soon hold a press conference to explain his side of the story and clear the air surrounding his involvement in the case.

This denial has now created a complex situation for the SIT. Investigators had previously believed that Tomar’s involvement was proven not only through digital chats but also through the chain of events that followed, including the physical destruction of key evidence. Now, with Tomar disowning all knowledge of Sonam, the SIT must reinforce their findings and seek corroboration from independent sources.

The focus has returned to Shilam James, who allegedly acted on Tomar’s instructions to destroy evidence. According to police, Shilam admitted during interrogation that he had burned some items and dumped others into a drainage canal. The black bag, which was mentioned frequently during the probe, was among the items believed to have been eliminated. A video surfaced showing attempts to dispose of the bag, adding further weight to the allegations.

However, none of this has swayed Lokendra’s stance. In court, he remained calm and firm, reiterating that he had no connection to Sonam, Raja, or the case at large. He claimed that the entire episode was a misunderstanding and that his arrest was based on circumstantial assumptions.

Police sources now say that forensic analysis of the recovered items, especially Sonam’s laptop and Raja’s mobile phone, is underway. They hope that data from these devices can directly tie Sonam to the Indore flat and confirm whether Lokendra had any digital interaction with her. If such evidence surfaces, it may directly contradict Tomar’s statement and re-establish his involvement.

Meanwhile, the public continues to watch the case with growing interest. The tragic death of Sonam Raghuvanshi, surrounded by mysteries and allegations of a cover-up, has sparked public outrage and a demand for justice. Activists and local citizens are urging law enforcement to ensure that no accused escapes accountability due to technicalities or lack of follow-up.

Legal experts believe that while Tomar’s denial is significant, it does not necessarily weaken the SIT’s case if the forensic and digital evidence remains strong. “A denial in court is a common defense tactic. What matters is whether the SIT can present a coherent narrative backed by evidence. If the WhatsApp messages are authenticated and forensic evidence links the accused to the flat, the denial will not hold much weight,” said a senior legal advisor familiar with the case.

For now, Tomar remains in police custody under transit remand, and further interrogation is expected to take place in Indore. The SIT is also planning to question Shilam James again to verify whether he acted independently or under instructions, and whether any financial transactions can be traced back to Tomar.

Additionally, investigators are reportedly looking into surveillance footage, visitor logs, and building entry records for the Indore flat to establish Sonam’s presence and any possible contact with Tomar. A key part of the investigation hinges on confirming whether Sonam actually lived in the property under Tomar’s name or with his knowledge.

Another aspect under investigation is the origin and handling of the now-infamous black bag. Was the bag in Sonam’s possession when she last visited the flat? Who was last seen handling it? Why was there such urgency in getting rid of it? These questions remain unanswered and could be the key to breaking the case open.

Despite the turn of events, law enforcement remains determined. An officer from the SIT said, “This case is far from over. A denial does not erase evidence. We are pursuing every lead. The truth will come out.”

With the media closely following every development and public pressure mounting, the police are now racing against time to ensure that their case holds up in court. The next few days will be crucial as forensic results arrive, and fresh testimonies are recorded.

The Sonam Raghuvanshi case, now entangled in a web of denial, alleged cover-ups, and a rapidly evolving legal battle, has become a litmus test for how effectively India’s investigative systems can function under pressure. Whether Lokendra Tomar’s denial is an act of self-preservation or a truthful claim of innocence remains to be seen. What is certain is that the stakes have never been higher for both the prosecution and the defense.

PLAY VIDEO: