Sanjay Kapoor had a feeling of his death, he made such a will that Karishma’s fortunes would change, Priya was shocked

.

.

.

Sanjay Kapoor’s Shocking Will: Daughter Samaira to Inherit ₹10,300 Crore Empire, Leaving Priya Sachdeva Reeling

In a startling development following the untimely death of Bollywood star and entrepreneur Sanjay Kapoor on June 12, 2025, the contents of his last will and testament have emerged—upending family expectations, igniting legal debate, and leaving his widow, Priya Sachdeva, stunned. Rather than entrusting his estimated ₹10,300 crore business empire to his widow or even his ex-wife Karisma Kapoor’s sisters, Sanjay bequeathed the entirety of his holdings to his 20-year-old daughter, Samaira Kapoor. The decision bypasses both Priya and his seven-year-old son, Kiyan, raising urgent questions about motive, legal validity, and the future stewardship of one of India’s most high-profile family enterprises.

A Will Drafted on the Brink

According to sources close to the late actor, Sanjay Kapoor completed his will just days before his death, suggesting he either sensed mortality closing in or feared foul play. His London residence reportedly housed the signed document in a secure vault, marked with explicit clauses that leave no room for interpretation:

All property, shares, and intellectual‐property rights are to be held in trust for his daughter, Samaira Kapoor.
Samaira will assume full control of the business upon reaching the age of 20 or upon deemed competence by the board—whichever comes later.
Until Samaira is ready, the existing board of directors retains all decision‐making authority, but Sanjay’s former “chair seat” must remain vacant.
In the event that Samaira predeceases her father or cannot assume control, the entire estate is to be donated to a charitable foundation that Sanjay had long envisioned.
His son, Kiyan Kapoor, is granted a discretionary legacy: Samaira may allocate gifts or benefits to him at her sole discretion, but no guaranteed bequests are stipulated.
Priya Sachdeva is mentioned only in the context of executing the will; she receives no fixed share.

This distribution effectively sidelines Priya as a principal heir and reduces Kiyan’s inheritance to Samaira’s goodwill. The geste appears to reflect Sanjay’s desire to protect his young daughter above all, but raises immediate red flags about testamentary intent and legal equity.

Corporate Empire on Pause

Sanjay Kapoor’s business interests spanned film production, luxury hospitality, real-estate holdings in Mumbai and London, and minority stakes in several tech start-ups. Together, these assets form an empire valued at over ₹10,300 crore, making Kapoor Family Enterprises one of the nation’s largest privately held conglomerates. Industry insiders confirm that, per the will, the board of directors—comprising Sanjay’s longtime partners and professional executives—must continue operations without a replacement for his former chairmanship. Only when Samaira is deemed ready will she occupy her father’s seat and wield full voting power.

“The implications for corporate governance are profound,” says Rajesh Verma, a governance consultant based in Mumbai. “On one hand, the board can maintain stability over the next few years; on the other, the absence of a figurehead risks strategic inertia. Samaira’s eventual rise is ensured, but the transition must be carefully managed.”

Suspicions of Foul Play

Legal experts and family confidantes point out that Sanjay’s unusually restrictive will could signal a deep-seated anxiety about potential challenges to his estate—or even darker possibilities. Rumors are already circulating that he may have suspected someone of plotting against him, prompting him to lock down his assets for his daughter’s benefit. The inclusion of an orphanage clause as a contingency beneficiary adds weight to the theory that he feared sudden incapacity or worse.

Witnesses to Kapoor’s final public appearance on the London polo field reported no obvious distress—yet his collapse was so rapid that many suspected anaphylaxis from a bee sting. Police in Delhi have not ruled out a routine accident, but the sudden emergence of here-today-gone-tomorrow testamentary instructions has reignited questions about motive and means.

Priya Sachdeva’s Silent Shock

Perhaps the most shocking aspect of the will is Priya Sachdeva’s absence from the beneficiary list. Under Indian succession law, a spouse typically receives at least a statutory share—often one-third—unless explicitly disinherited by a validly executed will. Some legal observers suspect the will may be contested on grounds of undue influence or lack of testamentary capacity. Others argue that Sanjay’s foresight in engaging a top London law firm to draft the document bolsters its validity.

Priya, who married Sanjay in 2016, declined to comment on the record. Close friends describe her as “utterly blindsided,” noting that she had expected either joint control or a significant stake. “She’s devastated and feels betrayed,” says one family insider. “Priya believed she and Sanjay shared a partnership in both life and business. This will changes that in an instant.”

Karisma’s Poised Response

Sanjay’s ex-wife, Karisma Kapoor, the mother of both Samaira and Kiyan, has taken a notably measured stance. Though no longer married, Karisma retains a position of moral authority as the parent of both children. She issued a brief statement through her spokesperson:

“I respect Sanjay’s wishes and will support our daughter to the best of my ability. My priority remains the well-being of Samaira and Kiyan.”

Observers note that Karisma has quietly positioned herself as Samaira’s guardian and mentor, offering emotional support and public reassurance. Should Priya and other parties mount legal challenges, Karisma’s role could prove decisive in ensuring Samaira’s interests prevail.

Kiyan Left in Limbo

Seven-year-old Kiyan Kapoor’s status is uncertain. The will’s discretionary provisions allow Samaira to appoint her brother any gifts she chooses, but offer him no guaranteed inheritance. Child-advocacy groups point out that such testamentary structures can disadvantage minor heirs, especially if guardians themselves lack binding obligations. A petition on Samaira’s behalf could seek a protective order or interim support, but the approach will depend on the discretion of her legal custodians—primarily Karisma and, nominally, Priya as the executor.

“The best interests of the child standard,” explains family law specialist Advocate Priya Menon, “ensures a minor cannot be left destitute by a parent’s capricious bequest. Courts can intervene to adjust a will’s terms if a child’s rightful share is jeopardized.”

The Board’s Interim Authority

Between now and Samaira’s twenty-first birthday, Kapoor Family Enterprises faces an unusual governance mandate: operate without a formal chairperson, yet adhere to the spirit of Sanjay’s vision. According to a board member who spoke on condition of anonymity, plans are underway to establish a supervisory committee—comprising senior executives, independent directors, and a Karisma-appointed family representative—to oversee major decisions. This ensures that no single individual can unilaterally deviate from Sanjay’s strategic blueprint.

“We respect Mr. Kapoor’s legacy,” the board member said. “He believed succession should be merit-based. When Samaira demonstrates the knowledge and leadership to guide the company, she will assume her father’s role. Until then, we operate as caretakers of his dream.”

Surge of Public Interest and Media Debate

The sensational nature of the will has thrust the Kapoor family into the global spotlight once again. Social media platforms brim with speculation:

Supporters of Samaira applaud Sanjay’s paternal devotion and his desire to secure his daughter’s future.
Critics of Priya accuse her of opportunism, though none of her associates have publicly defended her position.
Legal pundits debate whether testamentary freedom should yield to equitable distribution norms.

#WillOrFairness and #JusticeForKiyan trended on Twitter within hours of the will’s revelation. Mental-health advocates have also highlighted the emotional toll on minor heirs caught in high-stakes inheritance battles.

Legal Pathways: Contesting or Upholding the Will

Under Indian law, Priya Sachdeva has the right to challenge the will in a probate court on several grounds:

Testamentary Capacity: Did Sanjay possess the mental competence to execute such a sweeping estate plan?
Undue Influence: Was any party—family member or advisor—exerting pressure on him?
Formal Validity: Were all procedural requirements in London (witnesses, attestation, and registration) properly fulfilled?

If a challenge succeeds, the court may invalidate certain clauses or the entire will, redistributing assets per intestacy laws or earlier wills. Conversely, if the will is upheld, Priya’s recourse would be limited to her executor’s fee and statutory legacy—potentially a small fraction of the estate.

Kiran Agarwal, a noted probate attorney in Mumbai, remarks: “High-net-worth estates often produce fiercely contested probate litigation. This case is magnified by Bollywood star power and the intermingling of cross-border jurisdictions. London’s Chancery rules, where the will was drafted, may afford higher deference to testamentary freedom than Indian courts typically allow.”

The Emotional Undercurrents

Beyond legalities, the will reveals Sanjay Kapoor’s deepest priorities: his daughter’s welfare over all else. Insiders say he feared that, in the chaos of his death, corporate executives or even his widow might dilute Samaira’s inheritance. By bypassing traditional spousal claims, he attempted to create an unassailable bulwark around his daughter’s future.

Yet those who knew him best caution against viewing the document as mere cold calculus. “Sanjay was an intensely private person who wore success lightly,” recalls a close friend. “His love for Samaira was his anchor. The will is as much a reflection of his paternal devotion as it is a legal safeguard.”

What Lies Ahead?

As the Kapoor family braces for possible courtroom showdowns, several outcomes loom:

Probate Proceedings: Priya may file to contest the will, triggering months of legal discovery, witness statements, and expert testimony.
Family Settlement: Karisma and Priya could negotiate an out-of-court settlement, perhaps granting Priya a fixed lump sum or share in exchange for preserving Samaira’s controlling stake.
Board Governance Plan: Executives may formalize a charter for interim management, balancing corporate continuity with Sanjay’s instructions.
Public Backlash or Support: The family’s reputations—and their brands—could suffer or benefit based on how they navigate the dispute.

Conclusion: Testament to a Father’s Love—and a Modern Dilemma

Sanjay Kapoor’s last will is more than a legal instrument; it is a narrative of a father’s fierce determination to protect his daughter, even at the expense of customary expectations. By entrusting Samaira with a ₹10,300 crore legacy, he ensured that her future would be safeguarded against uncertainty. Yet in doing so, he laid bare the fault lines of family loyalty, inheritance law, and corporate governance.

For Priya Sachdeva, the will poses an existential question: should she defend her spousal rights through litigation, or honor Sanjay’s apparent wish to elevate his daughter above all? For Karisma Kapoor, it demands the delicate balancing act of championing Samaira’s claims while preserving family unity. And for young Samaira Kapoor herself, it marks the dawn of a destiny she neither chose nor anticipated—one that will test her resilience far beyond the privileges of celebrity.

In the coming weeks, the world will watch as the Kapoor legacy unfolds in courtrooms and boardrooms alike. One thing remains certain: Sanjay Kapoor’s final testament has transformed private grief into a public spectacle, forcing us all to confront the complex interplay between love, law, and the legacies we leave behind.

PLAY VIDEO: