हत्या की पूरी साज़िश का पर्दाफाश! Baghpat Moulana Family Case Latest Update | UP Police | CM Yogi

.
.

Was the Maulana the Real Killer? Postmortem Twists and a Disappearing Caretaker Complicate Baghpat Triple Murder Case

GANGNOLI, BAGHPAT, UTTAR PRADESH – The brutal murder of a Maulana’s family in the quiet village of Gangnoli has plunged the community into fear and silence. What was initially reported as a crime committed by two minor students has unraveled into a complex conspiracy, with police now scrutinizing a third party, a missing technical caretaker, and questioning the sudden departure of the Maulana Ibrahim himself.

The chilling crime—the murder of the Maulana’s wife and two young daughters—has left investigators battling confusion and public outrage, forcing the state government to consider a full CBI investigation as layers of deception and hidden motives are exposed.

The Scene of the Crime: Silence and Shock

Maulana Ibrahim, known as Hafiz Saheb, served as the Imam at the village mosque. His simple life of prayer and teaching was shattered when his wife, Israna, and their two young daughters were brutally murdered. The scene was horrific: blood splatters on the walls, objects strewn across the room, and a pervasive silence that spoke of unimaginable cruelty.

The Initial Arrests and the Shocking Motive

Police initially focused on the two minor boys, students who regularly received religious instruction from the Maulana. CCTV footage from the outer hallway showed one 16-year-old boy near the room at the time of the incident.

Confession: Under interrogation, the boys confessed to the crime, claiming they acted out of revenge because the Maulana had scolded them. They admitted that they killed the two little girls because they woke up and started crying.
Public Outrage: This confession—that such a heinous act was committed over a simple scolding—shocked the village, which struggled to believe that minors, who regularly read verses from the Quran, could be capable of such “blind brutality.”
Public Distrust: The community erupted in protest against the police, accusing them of framing the minors and demanding a CBI inquiry, believing the true mastermind was still at large.

The Maulana’s Sudden Departure

Initially suspected by the police due to his absence during the crime, Maulana Ibrahim was briefly detained. He maintained his innocence, pointing to his functional CCTV cameras.

However, days after burying his wife and daughters, the Maulana announced he was leaving Gangnoli permanently, stating, “I have no one left in this village. My wife and daughters were my whole world. Now only pain remains.”

Growing Suspicion: His departure immediately fueled local anger. Villagers accused him of being ungrateful for their support, and of fleeing because he knew the “real secret.” The question echoed in the streets: “If the Maulana is innocent, why is he running?”
The Unborn Victim: The family’s tragedy was compounded when the postmortem report revealed that Israna was five months pregnant, making the crime a quadruple murder and escalating the severity of the case.

The Third Character: The Missing Caretaker

As the investigation deepened, inconsistencies in the original confession became undeniable. The Maulana’s brother-in-law publicly stated that the minors lacked the “courage or the planning ability” to commit such a precise act, insisting they were “pawns in a larger conspiracy.”

The key to the mystery lay in the very evidence the Maulana had provided: the CCTV system.

The Admin Code: Police technical reports confirmed that the CCTV camera in the murder room was deliberately switched off using an admin access code. This code was known only to the Maulana and the mosque’s technical caretaker.
The Disappearance: The technical caretaker, whose name was withheld, vanished immediately after the incident. His phone was switched off, and his house was empty.
Shifting Focus: This immediately shifted police suspicion from the minors to the missing caretaker, a technologically savvy individual who had the means and knowledge to execute a planned cover-up. Investigators now believe this caretaker may be the “third character” who poisoned the minds of the minors and orchestrated the precise, technically hidden crime.

Conclusion: The Final Push for Justice

The case has now reached a critical juncture. Following the contradictory statements from the minors (one of whom recanted his confession under the claim of duress) and the mounting evidence of an external, technologically aware accomplice, local police have requested the state government transfer the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

The CBI investigation, if approved, would meticulously re-examine every piece of evidence, every witness statement, and every minute of recovered technical data to uncover the identity of the true mastermind.

The questions that remain central to the tragedy are:

Was the Maulana involved? Or is his departure an act of grief and fear, not guilt?
Were the minors manipulated? And if so, by whom?
Is the missing caretaker the key? Or does the mastermind’s identity lie in the deeper family disputes hinted at by the brother-in-law’s testimony?

Gangnoli remains covered in silence, but beneath that silence lies a growing demand: the community is waiting for the CBI to intervene, hoping that the ultimate truth of the quadruple murder will finally be brought to light.

.