Hindi Vs Marathi: Eknath Shinde in tension due to Hindi Marathi dispute, will he turn back again?

The political landscape of Maharashtra, India’s economic powerhouse, is simmering with a volatile mix of linguistic pride, regional identity, and power struggles. At the heart of this turmoil lies the age-old Marathi versus Hindi debate, reignited by shifting alliances, fractured parties, and leaders scrambling to secure their foothold in a state where language is not just a mode of communication but a marker of identity. The recent clashes in Mira Bhayandar, where Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) workers were detained en masse, and the growing camaraderie between Uddhav Thackeray’s Shiv Sena (UBT) and Raj Thackeray’s MNS have exposed the fragility of Maharashtra’s political equilibrium. This article delves into the undercurrents of this crisis, examining how linguistic chauvinism, opportunism, and survival tactics are reshaping the state’s future.

The Mira Bhayandar Flashpoint: Protests, Detentions, and Rising Anger

The coastal town of Mira Bhayandar became the epicenter of Maharashtra’s political storm on July 8, 2025, when police detained hundreds of MNS workers ahead of a planned protest march. The demonstration, aimed at asserting Marathi asmita (pride), was abruptly banned, triggering accusations of governmental overreach. MNS cadres, waving saffron flags and shouting slogans like “Maharashtra for Marathis!”, clashed with police, who cited “law and order concerns” for the crackdown. The detentions, however, only amplified the resentment.

For Uddhav Thackeray’s Shiv Sena (UBT), which has increasingly aligned with MNS on linguistic issues, the crackdown was a strategic gift. Uddhav, once a staunch critic of Raj Thackeray’s anti-migrant rhetoric, now shares stages with his cousin, united by their shared Marathi identity and mutual disdain for Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s faction. This unlikely alliance has left Shinde—the man who split Shiv Sena in 2022 to ally with the BJP—isolated, his claim to Bal Thackeray’s legacy crumbling as Uddhav and Raj consolidate the Marathi vote.

Eknath Shinde’s Precarious Tightrope: Power vs. Identity

Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, once hailed as the BJP’s Trojan horse in Maharashtra, now faces a political quagmire. His decision to align with the BJP in 2022 secured him the chief ministerial chair but alienated Shiv Sena’s core Marathi base. The recent MNS-UBT partnership has further eroded his support, with even allies like Minister Pratap Sarnayak questioning the government’s heavy-handedness. “Why are Marathi people denied permission to march? Who wants to suppress our voice?” Sarnayak asked pointedly, hinting at BJP interference.

Shinde’s dilemma is twofold:

Loyalty to the BJP: His government’s survival depends on BJP support, but the party’s pan-India Hindu nationalist agenda clashes with MNS’s parochial Marathi demands.
Identity Crisis: By opposing the Mira Bhayandar protests, Shinde risks being branded a “traitor” to Marathi causes. Yet, backing the protests would strain his BJP ties.

This balancing act grows trickier as Uddhav and Raj weaponize the language debate, framing Shinde as a puppet of “outsider forces.” With local body elections looming, Shinde’s faction risks becoming collateral damage in this war of narratives.

The BJP’s Conundrum: Hindutva vs. Regionalism

The BJP, Maharashtra’s kingmaker since 2014, finds itself in unfamiliar territory. The party’s national success hinges on Hindu unity, transcending linguistic and regional divides. However, MNS’s aggressive Marathi-first agenda threatens to fracture this coalition, particularly among Hindi-speaking migrants who form a critical part of the BJP’s voter base in cities like Mumbai and Nagpur.

Senior BJP leaders privately admit the party is walking a tightrope. “We can’t alienate Marathi speakers, but we also can’t abandon non-Marathi Hindus,” confided a Mumbai MP. Publicly, the BJP has distanced itself from the Mira Bhayandar crackdown, with state president Chandrashekhar Bawankule stating, “Law and order is a state subject.” Yet, this neutrality rings hollow as Shinde’s allies blame “invisible central forces” for the protest ban.

The BJP’s discomfort underscores a larger truth: In Maharashtra, Hindutva cannot easily subsume linguistic identity. As Raj Thackeray quipped at a recent rally, “You can’t chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to hide the fact that Mumbai’s signboards are now in Gujarati and Hindi!”

The Three-Way Split: Shiv Sena, MNS, and the Shinde Faction

Maharashtra’s political arena is now a triangular contest, with each faction vying to out-Marathi the others:

Uddhav Thackeray’s Shiv Sena (UBT): Once the undisputed champion of Marathi causes, Uddhav lost credibility after allying with the Congress-NCP in 2019. His pact with MNS is a desperate bid to reclaim the Marathi mantle.
Raj Thackeray’s MNS: After years of marginalization, Raj has reinvented himself as the guardian of Marathi asmita. His strategy—combining fiery rhetoric with street protests—mirrors his uncle Bal Thackeray’s playbook.
Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena: Shinde’s faction, reliant on BJP backing, struggles to reconcile its regional roots with central diktats. Ministers like Sarnayak openly criticizing the protest ban signal growing internal dissent.

This fragmentation has turned Maharashtra into a battleground of competing regionalisms, where language is less about culture and more about political survival.

The Historical Roots of the Language Debate

The current crisis is rooted in Maharashtra’s complex linguistic history. The Samyukta Maharashtra Movement of the 1950s, which fought for a Marathi-speaking state, established language as a core political issue. However, globalization and migration have diluted Marathi dominance, especially in Mumbai, where only 42% speak the language natively.

MNS and Shiv Sena have long exploited this anxiety, framing migrants as “outsiders stealing jobs.” Yet, the irony is stark: Mumbai’s economy relies on these migrants, from Uttar Pradesh laborers building coastal roads to Bihari security guards staffing luxury towers. As political analyst Kumar Ketkar notes, “The Marathi manoos [common man] is caught between pride and pragmatism. He wants his language respected but knows his city can’t function without migrants.”

The Road Ahead: Elections, Alliances, and Unanswered Questions

With the 2024 state elections reshuffling Maharashtra’s political deck, three scenarios loom:

UBT-MNS Merger: If Uddhav and Raj formalize their alliance, they could consolidate 35–40% of the Marathi vote, marginalizing Shinde and pressuring the BJP.
BJP’s Countermove: The BJP might distance itself from Shinde, positioning itself as a “neutral” party appealing to both Marathi and non-Marathi Hindus.
Rise of New Players: Smaller parties like Prakash Ambedkar’s Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi could exploit the chaos, championing subaltern Marathi castes neglected by elite-led movements.

Amid this uncertainty, one truth remains: Maharashtra’s identity politics is no longer about language alone. It’s a proxy war for control of India’s richest state, where power, pride, and pragmatism collide. As the dust settles in Mira Bhayandar, the question lingers—will Maharashtra’s leaders rise above narrow agendas, or will the state remain trapped in a cycle of linguistic strife and fractured mandates? The answer will shape not just its politics but the very idea of India as a pluralistic democracy.

Play video :