Shocking revelation from the pilot’s last call recording after the plane crash! Air India crash Ahmedabad.

.

.

.

Shocking Revelation from Pilot’s Last Call: The Mystery of the Air India Ahmedabad Crash

Ahmedabad, June 12, 2025 – What began as a routine summer afternoon in Ahmedabad would end as one of the most chilling days in recent Indian aviation history. Air India flight AI 171, scheduled for a standard domestic journey, became the center of a catastrophic tragedy, leaving the nation shocked and aviation experts scrambling for answers. Now, with the official crash report out and details from the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) released, fresh revelations have raised even more disturbing questions—suggesting that what led to this disaster is still shrouded in a web of mystery and, possibly, a deep systemic issue.

Ahmedabad Plane Crash: आखिरी 5 मिनट में दोनों पायलट के बीच में क्या हुई थी  बात? अब होगा खुलासा

A Flight Like Any Other

At 12:30 PM, beneath the intense heat of the Ahmedabad sun, preparations for Air India flight AI 171’s departure were underway. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, a modern, well-maintained machine, was ready for takeoff. The cockpit was manned by Captain Sumit Sabrawal and his experienced co-pilot Ansh Sharma—both underwent routine medical checks that morning. They tested clear for any substance influence, appeared well-rested, and by all protocols, they were “fit to fly,” reflecting utmost professionalism.

The jet was fueled with 54,200 kilograms—ample for the journey, and well within the plane’s maximum takeoff weight of 281,883 kg, as the plane was at approximately 234,000 kg. Technically, the aircraft was light for its class, guaranteeing optimum engine performance. Routine checks of all critical systems were logged, and nothing out of the ordinary was found. Weather conditions were clear: calm skies, stable temperature, and no adverse phenomena. On the surface, this was set to be a textbook flight.

Preparation and Takeoff

Passenger boarding commenced in the usual fashion—children’s laughter, casual conversations, and anticipation for the journey ahead filled the cabin. Time ticked by; at precisely 1:16:59 PM, the flight crew contacted Air Traffic Control (ATC) for engine start clearance. “Clear for startup,” came the reply. The request for the full runway length was granted—demonstrating the pilots’ adherence to maximum safety without risk or shortcuts.

AI 171 taxied to the very end of Runway 23 and began its takeoff roll. Footage later confirmed that takeoff occurred from the very last inch of available asphalt, with no sign of haste or error. The procedure was according to the book: the engines roared; the plane accelerated down the 3500-meter runway; rotation and liftoff were smooth and professional.

Catastrophe Strikes Mid-Air

But just 32 seconds after leaving the ground, tragedy struck. The flight, still climbing and not yet at cruising altitude, suddenly suffered from a double engine flameout—both engines lost power, one after the other, within a second’s gap. The reason? The black box detailed that the fuel supply to both engines had been simultaneously and inexplicably cut—first one, then the other in chilling sequence.

What happened then has become the stuff of nightmares for aviators. The voice recorder captured the following exchange between the pilots:

“Why did you do that?” “I didn’t do anything.” (Silence).

This disturbing back-and-forth, mere seconds before the crash, reveals no alarm, no panic—only incredulity and helplessness. One pilot questioned, the other denied action; then silence descended, broken only by the whine of instruments and the impending reality of disaster.

विमान हादसे के बाद पायलट की आखिरी कॉल रिकॉर्डिंग से, चौंकाने वाला खुलासा!  air india crash ahmedabad

Aviation’s Final Safeguard: The RAT Deploys

With both engines dead, the only system left to provide minimal power was the Ram Air Turbine (RAT)—a small wind-driven emergency generator that deploys from the belly of the plane in the event of total engine failure. CCTV footage later corroborated this, showing the RAT extending into the airstream like a final beacon of survival, providing crucial control power and hydraulics for a brief window.

The pilots desperately attempted to restart the engines. The first officer re-engaged the fuel control switches to the “run” position, attempted engine relight protocols, and activated the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) for emergency electrical support. Despite these efforts, neither engine responded.

The Last Recorded Words

As the aircraft lost altitude, cockpit alarms blared. The pilots’ final act was a last call to ATC:

“We are about to crash…”

ATC acknowledged with a “Copy your mayday, Air India 71V…” But there was nothing more—radio silence engulfed the channel. From the ATC tower, controllers witnessed the unimaginable: a sleek Dreamliner devolving into a fireball, plummeting toward the city below.

The Crash and Its Horrific Aftermath

The Boeing 787 struck the ground at around 1:39 PM. But its destruction didn’t end with the initial impact. In a terrifying domino effect, the fuselage smashed through five separate buildings in rapid succession: a tall chimney, a hospital rooftop, and multiple residential complexes. Each collision ripped the plane apart, scattering wreckage across a 1400-foot radius.

The devastation was total: out of 260 souls onboard, only one passenger survived. Black box data stopped recording at the moment of impact, as the aircraft itself was obliterated.

System Analysis: No Birds, No Fuel Issue—Just More Questions

The investigation meticulously examined every standard cause for such a crash. Bird strike? Ruled out—no evidence from flight data, radar, or security footage. Fuel contamination? Tests confirmed the fuel was clean and up to standard. Mechanical failure? The engines and critical systems showed no signs of prior defect or neglect.

The incident was bizarre in the extreme. The dual fuel switches, which directly control the flow to each engine, had moved from “run” to “cutoff” in sequence—an action requiring considerable physical effort due to their spring-loaded, protected design. For both switches to disengage nearly simultaneously, without warning or indication, was deemed “almost impossible” by experienced pilots and accident investigators.

Is Human Error to Blame?

With technical explanations exhausted, suspicion inevitably turned toward the pilots. Could they have, in a moment of crisis or confusion, accidentally cut both fuel switches? Experts argue it is highly unlikely. The switches are specifically designed to prevent inadvertent activation; they are locked by safety covers and require a strong, intentional movement—something that neither pilot, fully focused on takeoff and climb, could plausibly do by accident in just one second.

The investigation report stopped short of explicitly blaming the crew, but noted that “pilot action caused dual engine flameout.” Media coverage ran with this verdict, with outlets like the BBC stating, “No technical issues—Pilot action caused crash.” Yet among pilot unions and aviation professionals, this conclusion has been hotly contested as oversimplified, if not unfair.

The FAA Bulletin: A Chilling Precedent

Digging deeper, the report referenced a critical FAA bulletin from December 17, 2018, raising concerns about the fuel control switches on the Boeing 737 (a different, but somewhat related model). The bulletin warned that, in rare circumstances, a fault in the locking mechanism could cause the switches to disengage unintentionally. Although this was deemed not serious enough for a full airworthiness directive at the time, investigators now noted that the Boeing 787 uses a similar design.

This raised a potential red flag. If such a vulnerability existed in the design, could it have been a contributing factor? The bulletin was acknowledged, but little follow-up was made worldwide—no mandated modifications, no urgent recalls.

No Answers—Just More Doubt

Air India’s maintenance records were immaculate. All scheduled checks and directives had been completed; component replacements performed on time; no lapses were found in the airline’s safety culture. The report, after thorough cross-examination, exonerated Boeing’s manufacturing, the engines’ producers, and even the maintenance team.

In effect, the investigation closed every technical and human avenue—yet could provide no certitude as to why, in the crucial seconds after takeoff, the fuel valves cut off, and both engines flamed out.

Conspiracy, Design Flaw, or Systemic Failure?

This ambiguity has led to widespread theorizing. Was it a unique software bug in the Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) system, triggered by a specific sequence of events? Was the fuel management module, buried deep in the code, susceptible to a rare glitch? Was there a latent mechanical vulnerability in the switch design, unnoticed until now?

Or, in the darkest speculations, could sabotage or external tampering have played a role? The transcripts’ chilling exchange between the pilots—“Why did you do that?”/“I didn’t do anything.” – leaves the question hauntingly unresolved.

Public Reaction and the Push for Change

The tragic loss of so many lives, the lone survivor’s harrowing ordeal, and the ambiguity of the official report have led to public anguish and outrage. Safety advocates have called for further investigation into Boeing’s cockpit hardware. Families of the victims, aviation bodies, and the nation itself demand clarity—and accountability.

Is this tragedy the result of an unsolved design flaw, or a mysterious, perhaps systemic failure the world still doesn’t understand? Until these questions are finally answered, the skies will bear the burden of uncertainty, and every takeoff will serve as a silent tribute to the passengers and crew of AI 171—victims not just of an accident, but possibly of a deeper, lingering flaw within the system itself.

play video: