Sanjay Dutt ERUPTS Over Maharashtra’s Marathi Language Controversy—His Reaction SHOCKED Everyone!

In recent days, Maharashtra has witnessed an intense war of words over the prominence of Marathi versus Hindi language. The debate isn’t just playing out on television panels—it’s seeped into streets, schools, and government offices, splitting the state’s politics into two fierce camps. On one side, Shiv Sena, the Thackeray faction, and MNS have raised the banner of Marathi pride and regional identity. On the other, the BJP and Shinde camp have voiced their dissent, calling for freedom of choice and individual expression.

.

.

.

The controversy gained steam when some politicians demanded making Hindi mandatory in schools, and insisted that all shop and government boards be written in Marathi. The issue is no longer about language—it’s now fused with questions of identity, rights, and even law and order. Tensions soared on social media when a video surfaced, allegedly showing Bollywood superstar Sanjay Dutt expressing his anger about the Marathi language row in fierce words. Suddenly, everyone was asking—did Sanjay Dutt really take such a strong stand? Is the viral video authentic, or just another internet rumor? What is the truth behind his supposed outburst?

To understand why emotions are running so high, it’s important to look at where the controversy began. In major cities like Mumbai and Pune, Shiv Sena and MNS activists raised objections to the prevalence of non-Marathi signage outside major shops, multinational brands, and government establishments. MNS chief Raj Thackeray even declared that anyone living in Maharashtra “must learn and adopt Marathi,” warning of potential action against those ignoring this directive. In response, BJP leaders countered that compulsion in language learning goes against the constitutional right to self-expression and the fabric of India’s multicultural society.

This conflict escalated, straying from rhetoric into real-world violence. In a shocking viral incident, a Hindi-speaking rickshaw driver was publicly assaulted at Mumbai’s Virar station for not knowing Marathi. The footage of the man being slapped, harassed and pressured to apologize—allegedly in the name of Marathi respect—sparked outrage across India and triggered memories of similar past clashes over linguistic pride.

Amidst this inflammatory environment, a video clip began circulating on social media, claiming that actor Sanjay Dutt had lashed out over the controversy. Speculation flew: was he supporting Marathi pride and lambasting political parties? But upon closer examination, the story fell apart. The controversial video was not based on facts. In reality, during a recent trailer launch event, Dutt was not directly questioned about the language row, and no dramatic statement came from him. When the topic was mentioned, he merely shook it off, saying he didn’t understand the question before the journalist’s mic cut out and the matter was dropped.

The real debate, however, rages on. The Maharashtra government’s decision to make Marathi a compulsory subject in all schools—from state board to international curriculum—has met fierce resistance from Hindi-speaking and out-of-state parents. Supporters argue that learning Marathi enriches cultural integration, while critics contend it’s an unnecessary burden on already overstressed students. Rival political camps continue to weaponize the issue, seeing it as an avenue for regional dominance or vote-bank consolidation.

Prominent leaders have weighed in. Deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis stated that while pride in Marathi is justified, no violence or coercion in its name will be tolerated. Anyone taking the law into their own hands—no matter the language—will face strict legal consequences. The message was clear: Maharashtra’s strength lies in its inclusivity and respect for all Indian languages, not in enforcing monolingualism with a heavy hand.

As the controversy simmers, one thing is certain: no viral video or celebrity rumor will decide the future of Maharashtra’s linguistic landscape. The real story is about striking a balance between preserving cultural identity and protecting individual rights—a lesson the entire country would do well to heed.