Amitabh Bachchan made a big mistake regarding PM Modi; got trolled after sharing a post, made remarks about the Prime Minister…

.

.

Amitabh Bachchan Faces Backlash for Avoiding PM Modi’s Name in Post Praising Operation Sindoor

In the aftermath of the devastating terrorist attack in Pahalgam, which shocked the entire nation, India launched Operation Sindoor — a swift and decisive military response that aimed to neutralize the threats and uphold national security. The operation received widespread attention and praise, not only from citizens but also from various celebrities in the Indian film industry. However, one notable figure remained conspicuously silent in the early days following the operation: the legendary actor Amitabh Bachchan.

Often referred to as the “Shahenshah of Bollywood” or the “Megastar of the Century,” Amitabh Bachchan is known not only for his cinematic brilliance but also for his articulate posts and thoughtful engagement with current affairs. So, when he refrained from commenting immediately after Operation Sindoor, fans and critics alike took notice.

Initially, the only signs of response from Amitabh’s official social media accounts were a few cryptic tweets — completely blank or with ellipses — leaving his audience puzzled. This uncharacteristic silence led to growing frustration among many of his followers, who began trolling the actor, questioning his apparent hesitation to speak out during a national crisis.

However, a few days later, Bachchan broke his silence with a long and emotionally intense blog post. The post, while commending the bravery of the Indian Armed Forces and mourning the loss of innocent lives, deliberately avoided mentioning Prime Minister Narendra Modi by name. Instead, wherever the context clearly indicated a reference to Modi, the actor used “…” (three dots).

The Controversial Post

The blog post described a harrowing fictionalized account of the Pahalgam attack, where a “monster” pulled a couple out during their vacation. The man was brutally executed in front of his pleading wife after being humiliated based on his religious identity. The woman, devastated, fell to her knees and begged for mercy, only to witness the ruthless murder of her husband.

According to Bachchan’s post, when the wife asked the terrorist to kill her too, he refused, saying, “Go tell … what happened.” The original implication, many inferred, was that the terrorist meant “Go tell Modi.” But Bachchan wrote only “…” in place of the Prime Minister’s name.

Later in the post, he referenced a poem by his father, the revered Hindi poet Harivansh Rai Bachchan. He imagined a daughter visiting “…” — once again presumably meaning Modi — to say, “I demand sindoor (vermillion) with the ashes of my husband’s funeral pyre.” He ended the post with the line, “And … gave her sindoor — Operation Sindoor.”

Public Reaction and Social Media Outrage

The reaction was swift and intense. Fans, commentators, and political observers took to social media to express their confusion, disappointment, and anger. One user tweeted, “What’s the problem with writing Modi? Are you afraid of saying his name?” Another suggested, “Maybe Jaya Bachchan asked him not to write it — after all, she’s a Samajwadi Party MP.”

Others accused Bachchan of hypocrisy, claiming that while he often speaks about patriotism and bravery, he seemed to back away from acknowledging the leadership that initiated the operation. Comments like “Modi ka naam lene se darr lagta hai kya?” (“Are you afraid to take Modi’s name?”) became common across platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook.

For many, this wasn’t just a literary choice or a stylistic decision. In a politically charged environment, avoiding the Prime Minister’s name in such a context was interpreted as a deliberate move — either to avoid controversy or due to political pressure from within his own household. Jaya Bachchan, Amitabh’s wife, is a known critic of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and a senior member of the opposition Samajwadi Party. This familial political dynamic only added fuel to the fire.

A Pattern of Silence?

This isn’t the first time Amitabh Bachchan has faced criticism for not taking a firm stand on politically sensitive issues. While he has supported national initiatives like Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India Mission) and promoted COVID-19 awareness campaigns, he has often remained quiet during moments of national tension or controversy.

Some argue that as a public figure and brand ambassador for various government campaigns, Bachchan has a responsibility to show support — not only in sanitized, neutral campaigns — but also in moments of national crisis. Others, however, defend his right to remain apolitical or non-partisan, emphasizing that celebrities should not be forced to align publicly with political leaders.

Artistic License or Political Caution?

One of the core debates emerging from this incident is whether Bachchan’s use of “…” was simply a creative decision or a politically calculated move. Supporters of the actor have argued that by omitting the Prime Minister’s name, he allowed the post to focus more on the tragedy and the strength of the Indian people and forces, rather than turning it into a political endorsement.

Critics, on the other hand, insist that the context of the post clearly pointed to PM Modi and that omitting his name was a passive-aggressive tactic to avoid public criticism while still gaining attention.

A particularly viral comment read: “If you are afraid to name Modi, then why post at all? Either speak clearly or stay silent. The ambiguity is disrespectful.”

The Role of Celebrities in National Discourse

This incident once again raises the question: What is the role of celebrities in times of national crises? Should they express their opinions openly and acknowledge leadership, or remain neutral and symbolic in their gestures? And, more importantly, can neutrality itself be a political statement?

Amitabh Bachchan’s post, full of emotion, symbolism, and literary references, was meant to pay tribute to the victims and to honor the response of the Indian military. But its impact was overshadowed by the conspicuous absence of one name: Modi. Whether it was intentional or accidental, the result was a firestorm of online criticism, memes, and speculation.

PLAY VIDEO:

What Next?

As of now, Amitabh Bachchan has not responded to the backlash or clarified why he chose to avoid mentioning the Prime Minister directly. With his status as one of the most respected figures in Indian cinema, his every word carries weight. While some hope he will issue a follow-up post or explanation, others believe his silence speaks volumes.

In the end, the situation reflects the complexity of being a public figure in a politically polarized society. One word — or the absence of one — can ignite debates that go far beyond the intent of the speaker.