Himanshi once again showed courage and gave a strong response to the abusive IT cell.

.

.

The Pahalgam Attack, Truth, and the Vilification of a Martyr’s Widow: India at a Crossroads

On April 22, 2025, a tragic terrorist attack occurred in Pahalgam, Kashmir, claiming the life of Lieutenant Vinay Narwal just six days after his wedding. While the country mourned the fallen officer, an unexpected storm of controversy erupted—not over the attack itself, but over the response to it by his young widow, Himanshi Narwal.

Himanshi, a well-educated woman and a graduate of Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), made a public appeal following her husband’s death. Her message was simple and human: “Don’t target Kashmiri Muslims for this attack. The people there tried to save lives. Don’t divide this on the lines of Hindu and Muslim.” Her call for unity, nuance, and truth has, however, been met with a vicious and organized campaign of online abuse.

A Widow Under Fire

Rather than being treated with compassion and respect, Himanshi Narwal has been subjected to a horrifying level of online vilification, largely fueled by right-wing online trolls and members allegedly affiliated with the ruling party’s digital ecosystem. The abuse has gone far beyond criticism—it has been intensely misogynistic, communal, and defamatory.

She has been accused—without evidence—of conspiring in her husband’s death, being involved in extramarital relations with Kashmiri men, and being an ideological traitor. Some tweets falsely claimed that she forced her husband to go to Kashmir, others fabricated stories about her personal life, branding her with slurs that no grieving widow should ever have to read, let alone in the public sphere.

One particularly disgusting narrative suggested that the attackers were her friends, and that she had leaked her husband’s movements. Another tweet crudely asserted that “her husband was killed because he was Hindu, uncircumcised, and didn’t know the Kalma.” These baseless and venomous claims aim not only to discredit her but also to intimidate others who may want to speak out.

National Commission for Women Responds

Faced with the barrage of online harassment, the National Commission for Women (NCW) was compelled to intervene. The NCW officially condemned the abuse, specifically calling out the online IT cell operatives and demanding an end to the smear campaign against Himanshi.

This institutional recognition, however, is rare and reactive. The fact that it took sustained, relentless harassment of a martyr’s widow to even elicit a statement reflects poorly on the structures meant to protect women and uphold civil discourse in India.

Targeting Truth Tellers

Himanshi Narwal is not alone. A pattern has emerged in Indian public discourse: those who question dominant narratives—particularly those set by the right-wing ecosystem—face coordinated smear campaigns. Other women like Shehla Negi and Neha Singh have also been subjected to rape threats and character assassinations for merely asking questions.

Shehla Negi, for instance, intervened during a communal attack in Nainital and tried to protect Muslim shopkeepers from a violent mob. For her courage, she was called a traitor and received graphic threats. In a video response, she rightly pointed out the hypocrisy: “You claim to protect women from rape, yet you threaten me with rape just for standing for justice.”

Neha Singh, a social media activist, questioned the government’s delayed response to the Pahalgam attack. She asked why Prime Minister Narendra Modi canceled his Kashmir visit just before the attack, whether he had prior information, and why the government had not yet apprehended the perpetrators. Instead of answers, she received an FIR and relentless online abuse. She was labeled a traitor, accused of running a brothel, and told that she was using the attack to promote herself.

Media Narratives vs Ground Reality

The media, in many cases, played a key role in inflaming tensions by pushing the narrative that the attackers asked for names, checked religious identities, and targeted people based on religion. Yet, multiple eyewitnesses and survivors have countered this claim. Mumbai-based survivor Patle, who was injured in the attack, stated that local Kashmiris helped save his life. “They carried me on their shoulders to safety. I don’t recall any religious screening by the attackers.”

The National Investigation Agency (NIA), in its preliminary report, also made no mention of religious identity being used to select victims. Despite this, the false narrative has stuck—thanks to aggressive social media campaigning, selective reporting, and right-wing amplification.

This deliberate distortion serves a political purpose. By framing the attack as an anti-Hindu, Muslim-perpetrated massacre, it strengthens the narrative that Indian Muslims are disloyal or dangerous. It deepens communal fault lines and distracts from governmental lapses in intelligence and security.

A Larger Pattern of Intimidation

This episode is not isolated. Across the country, Muslim citizens are increasingly being forced to prove their loyalty—sometimes literally at knifepoint. Videos have emerged from West Bengal, Aligarh, Karnataka, and elsewhere, showing mobs forcing Muslim men to chant religious slogans or desecrate symbols associated with their faith.

In one particularly disturbing case from Aligarh, a schoolboy was reportedly forced to urinate on a Pakistani flag to prove his patriotism. In another from Bengal, a man named Amit Dutta was arrested after he was filmed threatening Muslim rickshaw pullers with violence unless they shouted “Jai Shri Ram.”

These actions are not expressions of nationalism—they are acts of terror meant to intimidate and humiliate. They reflect a growing majoritarian sentiment that seeks to define Indianness in terms of religion and loyalty tests.

PLAY VIDEO:

The Real Threat to India

The real threat to India is not from individuals like Himanshi Narwal or Shehla Negi—it is from those who wish to turn pain into propaganda. The efforts to silence voices of dissent, to intimidate women who speak out, and to spread communal poison are doing irreparable harm to the democratic fabric of the country.

Instead of respecting the grief of a widow, a section of society chose to weaponize her tragedy. Instead of confronting the failures that led to a deadly attack, questions are met with smears, abuse, and threats.

India stands at a crossroads. It can either choose the path of truth, compassion, and unity—or descend further into a culture of hate, fear, and denial.

Himanshi Narwal’s dignity in the face of hate is a reminder of the courage it takes to speak truth in a time of manufactured narratives. The question now is: who will stand with her?