News ki Pathshala With Sushant Sinha: What is the reason behind the murder of tennis player Radhika Yadav?

.

.

Tragic Murder of Rising Tennis Star Radhika Yadav: A Case Full of Twists, Questions, and Unanswered Truths

In a shocking incident that has shaken the nation, 25-year-old tennis player Radhika Yadav was brutally shot and killed by her own father, Deepak Yadav, in their home in Gurugram. A promising athlete with a bright future, Radhika’s sudden death has left not only her family but the entire country grappling with one question: Why would a father kill his daughter?

According to initial reports, Radhika was running a small tennis academy in Gurugram and had begun exploring a career in content creation and acting through social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook. She had even collaborated with aspiring artists like Inamul Haq on a music video. However, this step into the public eye reportedly sparked tension within her family.

Deepak Yadav, her father, claimed that he was under immense social pressure. He told the police that people in the village taunted him, accusing him of living off his daughter’s earnings. Allegedly, these taunts pushed him to repeatedly ask Radhika to shut down her academy. But when she refused, an argument ensued that ended with Deepak shooting her four times, three bullets hitting her back and one her shoulder.

Despite this confession, many—including the police—believe the motive may be far deeper and more complex than just “social shame.” Relatives and neighbors described Deepak as a supportive and loving father who had invested heavily in Radhika’s tennis career from a young age. Some said he had spent lakhs on her training and even purchased an expensive ₹3 lakh tennis racket for her.

Suspicion around the true motive increased when it was revealed that Radhika’s social media accounts had been deleted just before her death. Instagram, Facebook—platforms where she actively posted tennis reels and videos—had all gone dark. The police are now investigating whether Radhika deleted these accounts herself or if someone else did it under pressure.

One theory suggests that Radhika’s growing interest in content creation and her friendship with Inamul Haq—a Muslim boy she worked with on a music video—might have caused tensions at home. While Inamul insists their interaction was purely professional and short-lived, some believe Deepak may have disapproved of this association, especially given social stigmas in certain conservative circles.

There are more red flags. Radhika had not attended her academy for the past 25 days. It was barely operational, with only a handful of students. So the idea that Deepak was being harassed for “living off her earnings” seems far-fetched, especially when it’s reported that he had a successful construction and interior design business and earned lakhs monthly through rental income.

On the day of the murder, Radhika was in the kitchen preparing for her mother’s birthday celebration. The tragedy that unfolded that day turned a moment of joy into lifelong grief. Her mother, Manju Yadav, initially refused to speak to police but later gave a vague statement claiming she heard nothing and did not know why her husband killed their daughter. Police are now also examining her potential role—or lack of response—in the incident.

As the investigation deepens, it becomes increasingly clear that there’s more to this case than meets the eye. The public and media continue to question whether the murder was truly triggered by societal shame or if it masked other hidden frustrations, possibly stemming from control, possessiveness, or deep-rooted mistrust.

This heartbreaking case is not just about the murder of a daughter by her father—it’s also a reflection of the pressures young women face when they break away from traditional paths. Whether seeking independence through sports, content creation, or personal relationships, they often clash with outdated expectations of “honor” and societal image.

PLAY VIDEO:

Radhika Yadav was not just a daughter. She was a national-level tennis player, an aspiring influencer, and a young woman with dreams. Her story—and the brutal way it ended—raises urgent questions about family dynamics, gender roles, and the dark consequences of unchecked societal pressures.