Tennis Player Radhika Yadav Murder: Inam-ul-Haq broke silence on Radhika

In a candid conversation, Radhika Yadav recently shared her perspective about a fleeting professional interaction she had with a noted actor-director, setting the record straight amid swirling rumors and speculations. Her account paints a clear picture: their connection was purely professional, brief, and based entirely on creative collaboration. There was no personal bond, deeper relationship, or hidden exchange beyond their shared commitment to a single music video project.

Radhika began by reflecting on the first time she met the actor, explaining that it was during a Tennis Premier League event held in Delhi. At that time, she recalls, she simply appeared as one of the players involved in the event—they had no personal interaction then. It was an encounter among many in her burgeoning career in sports, and it left no significant impression, neither day-to-day memories nor recurring conversations.

Months later, the actor reached out to her for a project—a music video—through the industry’s usual channels. Radhika herself had been recognized by the actor’s creative team for her strong visual presence; they thought she could be a good fit for the screen in that context. The outreach came through a routine process in their WhatsApp casting group. Radhika had been advised that her profile was being considered, but ultimately wasn’t selected initially due to concerns about her age relative to another artist already chosen. The creative team opted for an actress closer to the other co-actor’s age, as the age-composite was expected to resonate better on camera.

However, about a year later, the team decided to re-open casting. This time, Radhika was selected again. She was briefed that the project was unpaid, merely a collaboration to produce a creative music video, and was offered only a nominal “good luck amount”—enough to cover basic expenses and appreciation. The shooting took place in Noida over a period of four to five hours. Beyond these logistical details, Radhika says there was no further personal exchange; no texts once the cameras stopped, no casual meetups, no personal conversation. The interaction was professional and she parted ways with the team immediately after the shoot concluded.

Reflecting on her feelings, Radhika expressed surprise when her name appeared in recent reports with alarming headlines. She admits to being mentally disturbed by the controversy, especially as she tried to understand the source of the confusion. Social media often connected her to the actor in ways she never anticipated—some even spun unsubstantiated narratives involving false claims of romantic involvement or business deals. She cleared the air emphatically: they never met outside of that music-video set, and she knows nothing about his background, family, or personal life.

Radhika is also upset that the story has veered into religious and communal speculation. She described her horror at seeing comments linking the two of them to Hindu-Muslim tensions—labels she says have no basis. She stressed that she is not an activist or a public figure with political intent, and that her limited professional interaction with the actor was in no way related to religious identity or conflict. Not only is she a relatively new entrant into the public sphere, but the only traceable online clip linking her to him is still on YouTube in relation to that single music video shoot.

Amid all the noise, Radhika reiterated that she has no intention to escalate the matter. She is ready to cooperate with any inquiry, but suggested that any personal angle is baseless. The minor payment received post-shoot was never a token of bribe or exchange—it was merely acknowledgment for her time, one of many similar unpaid creative collaborations she’s participated in across her career. Those arrangements were always transparent, and in this case, she confirms the payment was around a “good luck” figure—just enough to support her for a basic meal or commute.

Finally, she shared a small reassuring detail: on set, her co-cast’s father had told her that he liked her performance in the shoot. That feedback echoed her sense of professionalism, which was grounded in a healthy creative environment. It reminded her that at its core, filmmaking and content creation relies on trust and mutual respect. Any attempt to diminish that trust with false insinuations, communal misinterpretations, or fabricated personal links is not only hurtful but damaging to both her reputation and that of the creative ecosystem.

In her concluding statement, Radhika said she hopes this clears the air. There is no hidden relationship, no compromise, no communal angle—just a day’s work, two professionals collaborating, and a music video that moved on, as planned. The media speculation, she said, is unfortunate but not insurmountable. She stands by the fact that her name is associated only with her own work and creative pursuit. And now, after a moment of anxious uncertainty, she’s ready to take a deep breath, resume her journey, and continue pursuing the path she set out on—through honest, grounded, and transparent creative expression.

Play video :