Mass Pr0test for CJI BR Gavai: Public and Supreme Court Lawyers Rally for Justice and Dignity – What Really Happened Outside Parliament?

In a powerful display of solidarity, citizens and Supreme Court lawyers gathered outside Parliament to support Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, following a shocking incident where an attempt was made to throw a shoe at him during a Supreme Court hearing. The crowd wasn’t just protesting the personal insult to the CJI, but also raising their voices against what they see as a broader attack on the dignity of the judiciary, the Constitution, and society itself.

The Constitution Respect March

As reporters captured the scene, a large group of people could be seen marching in what they called the “Constitution Respect Yatra.” Their message was clear: the recent attack on CJI Gavai was not merely an insult to an individual, but an affront to the entire judicial system and the values enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

Why the Protest?

Protesters explained that their demonstration was a democratic response to the Supreme Court incident, which they felt represented a deeper issue of caste-based discrimination. Many pointed out that CJI Gavai, a Dalit and a Buddhist, was targeted because of his background, arguing that such an act would not have occurred if he belonged to a different caste. The incident, they said, was symbolic of the ongoing struggles faced by marginalized communities in India.

The Demand for Accountability

Despite CJI Gavai’s personal forgiveness of the perpetrator, protesters insisted that the matter was not just personal. “This is an insult to the entire judiciary and the Constitution. If such acts go unpunished, what message does it send?” asked one lawyer. They called for strict legal action, not just for the dignity of one judge, but for the protection of India’s democratic institutions.

Caste, Justice, and Society

The protest also touched upon the recent suicide of a Dalit IPS officer in Haryana, highlighting the systemic issues of caste discrimination and injustice. Speakers argued that the silence of other judges and officials in the Supreme Court during the incident reflected deeper problems within the system.

Political and Social Reactions

The crowd expressed disappointment with the government’s response, claiming that authorities were slow to act and only responded after social media outrage. They criticized both the Prime Minister and the President for not taking stronger, more decisive action to defend the dignity of the judiciary and marginalized communities.

The Call for Change

Protesters vowed to keep fighting for justice, stating that if the government and courts failed to act, society would not remain silent. They emphasized their constitutional right to peaceful protest and insisted that such movements are necessary to awaken both the oppressed communities and the authorities.

The Meaning of “Sanatan” and True Justice

In a passionate address, one speaker challenged the misuse of the word “Sanatan” (eternal), arguing that true justice and nature make no distinction between caste, religion, or social status. He urged people not to be misled by divisive rhetoric and to recognize the universal values of equality and dignity.

Conclusion

The protest outside Parliament was more than just a reaction to a single incident—it was a call for accountability, equality, and respect for the Constitution. The demonstrators made it clear that forgiveness for personal insults does not erase the need for justice when the dignity of the nation’s institutions and its people is at stake.

What do you think about the public’s response and the need for accountability in such cases? Share your thoughts below!

The fight for dignity and justice continues. Will the system listen?